Which Craft?

God, give me grace to accept with serenity the things that cannot be changed, Courage to change the things which should be changed, and the Wisdom to distinguish the one from the other. (Serenity prayer attributed to Reinhold Niebuhr)

After more than ten years of practicing ‘change management’ I am feeling a bit uncomfortable. I am confused by an awkward feeling of incompetence and ignorance about what I consider to be my core competence.

When we say that we practice ‘change management’, which craft are we referring to?

Which Craft?

Regardless of the industry we work in, the methodology we use, or the certification we hold, there is another distinction we should make:

  • Transition: bringing an organization from a predetermined point A to a predetermined point B. Implementation is the key word here. This is the world I am living in today and this is what I take for granted when I talk about my craft.
  • Transformation: creating a new future state from scratch. Transformation is not about changing what is, but about creating what isn’t. It’s about shaping a different context in which new things become possible.
  • Transcendence: being the change you want to see in the world. More and more I have come to believe that ‘who we are’ determines a great deal of the possibilities we create.

The three ‘craft types’ are related in a magic way. We learn that the hard way: certain transitions are not possible because the transition that is needed for the shaping of the right context fails. Likewise: certain transformations fail because we lack character, presence and sovereignty on the level of being.

Witch Craft?

The success rate of what we do (transition) is related to the context we create (transformation) and this depends on our strength of character (transcendence).

The point I am trying to make is that we often focus on the “management” part of ‘change management’ when we explain what we do. Nothing wrong with that. I’d just wish we’d be at least as articulate about the “change” part.

It’s a distinction worth making. We need to articulate ‘which craft’ we are practicing in order to make the ‘witch craft’ work. It’s a matter of aligning what we are with the context we create and what we do as a result of that. I know our clients would be better off if we ‘d be more articulate about this. Moreover, we – as practitioners – wouldn’t have such a hard time getting on the same wavelength.

  • Cricri

    Snakes, sirens, witches… the slippery ambiguous and ambivalent
    personae of my doctoral thesis, seem to accompany me along a journey that is
    nothing else but “transitional”.

    Being a psychologist (university degree), anthropologist (another piece
    of paper called Ph.D.) says nothing about “what I actually did or do”
    with the accumulation of knowledge that pains the brain and invades my
    corridor’s messy and dusty library nor with the complex experiences on the
    field, where I act both as an insider and an outsider.

    By holding some fancy titles, “what I am supposed to do” is to
    display expertise, accept judgments without being judgmental and adapt
    constantly. This is a way of becoming ambivalent while avoiding inner contradictions.
    Hence, my three lovely companions!

    – Patients “believe” in me as if I was a witch,
    connected to their unconscious as to an invisible universe and capable of
    “magically” healing their pain, their sorrow, their devastating
    suffering.

    – Expatriate Managers calling upon my organizational expertise must most
    certainly consider me a siren, ambiguous, far too tolerant of local
    cultures and their annoying differences (sic), but an handy ally because able
    to channel attention of trainees of all levels and all races, able to transmit
    the company’s objectives thanks to an attractive package, by enchanting people
    who have ordinarily been reluctant and resistant to change.

    – To some eventually, I must be like a snake. Most probably
    because from time to time I permute…they are puzzled by the changing skin of
    the town’s shrink: Who is she? What does she do? One day she is here, another
    day she is there. One day she’s in corporate, another day she appears in local
    papers or on the telly. One day, she has to rush on an emergency site, another
    day she listens carefully and empathetically to the lost soul opening up on the
    couch. Slipping (seemingly effortlessly) from one particular context and its
    rules to another. No fear.

    Well, who the hell am I to know which craft I am using in this complex
    multilayered context with an array of different demands and expectations
    falling upon me…?

    I am still working on a better understanding of everything that lies
    under a crusty surface while being gazed upon constantly. Maybe that is what I
    am doing best: becoming in the eyes of others, what they need to responsibly
    engage in the processes of change.